In this edition: CJEU - Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered in C-24/15; Plöckl; Australia – NATIONAL INNOVATION AND SCIENCE AGENDA – INTANGIBLE ASSET DEPRECIATION; Australia – NATIONAL INNOVATION AND SCIENCE AGENDA – INCREASING ACCESS TO COMPANY LOSSES; IMF – Opening Address at the Open Workshop on International Taxation of the 7th IMF-Japan High Level Tax Conference for Asian Countries

 

From the CJEU:

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered in C-24/15; Plöckl (Do Article 22(8), the first subparagraph of Article 28c(A)(a) and Article 28c(A)(d) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC 1 of 17 May 1977 permit Member States to refuse to grant a tax exemption in respect of an intra-Community supply (in this instance, an intra-Community transfer) where, although the supplier has not taken all the measures that can reasonably be expected of him from the point of view of the formal requirements applicable to the recording of the [VAT] identification number, there is no specific evidence of tax evasion, the goods have been moved to another Member State and the other conditions of exemption from tax are also met?) (not available in English but available in many other languages)

 

From the Australian Treasury:

 

From the International Monetary Fund:

Opening Address at the Open Workshop on International Taxation of the 7th IMF-Japan High Level Tax Conference for Asian Countries

 

 

Copyright – internationaltaxplaza.info

 

 

Stay informed: Subscribe to International Tax Plaza’s Newsletter! It’s completely FREE OF CHARGE!

 

and

 

Follow International Tax Plaza on Twitter (@IntTaxPlaza)

 

 

Submit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn
INTERESTING ARTICLES